This will be a very long post with a lot of reading - but only because I have pinched a whole lot of stuff from Wikipedia about this AWI action! My thanks to Mark (Old Nick) at "Come on my Brave Fusiliers" blog for posting about this "battle" here https://bravefusiliers.blogspot.com/2025/02/breaking-down-xavier-della-gattas.html
The Battle of Paoli, also known as the Battle of Paoli Tavern or the Paoli Massacre, was a battle in the Philadelphia campaign of the American Revolutionary War fought on September 20, 1777, in the area surrounding present-day Malvern, Pennsylvania. Following the Continental Army's retreat in the Battle of Brandywine and the aborted Battle of the Clouds, George Washington left a force behind under the command of Brigadier General Anthony Wayne to monitor and resist the British as they prepared to attack and occupy the revolutionary capital of Philadelphia.
On the evening of September 20, British forces under Major General Charles Grey led a surprise attack on Wayne's encampment near the Paoli Tavern in present-day Malvern, resulting in many American casualties. With inaccurate later claims that the British took no prisoners and granted no quarter, the engagement came to be known as the "Paoli Massacre."
After the American defeat at the Battle of Brandywine on September 11, 1777, General Washington was intent on accomplishing two tasks. He wanted to protect the revolutionary capitol of Philadelphia from British forces under the command of Lieutenant General Sir William Howe and also shield his inland supply depots at Reading, which was 60 miles (97 km) northwest of Philadelphia, and at Lancaster, which was 65 miles (105 km) west of Philadelphia. Washington withdrew across the Schuylkill River on September 12, bypassing Philadelphia and heading northwest to the Falls of Schuylkill in the present-day East Falls section of Philadelphia.
After resting for a full day and refitting, Washington's army again crossed the Schuylkill River at Levering's Ford in present-day Manayunk on September 14 to face the British, who had moved little since Brandywine due to a shortage of wagons to carry their wounded and baggage.[4] After the Battle of the Clouds, an ultimately aborted engagement due to bad weather on September 16, Washington withdrew to Yellow Springs and Reading Furnace in northern Chester County to replenish his ammunition. He left Brigadier General Anthony Wayne's Pennsylvania Division at Yellow Springs in present-day Chester Springs. When the British columns moved towards the Schuylkill River, Wayne followed Washington's orders to harass the British and attempt to capture all or part of their baggage train.
Wayne assumed that his presence was undetected and camped close to the British lines 2 miles (3.2 km) from Paoli Tavern in Paoli. Wayne's division consisted of the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 7th, 8th, 10th and 11th Pennsylvania Regiments, Hartley's additional Continental Regiment, an attached artillery company and a small force of dragoons. The various regiments and units amounted to approximately 1,500 men. Several miles to the west and moving to join Wayne was William Smallwood's Maryland militia, who had approximately 2,100 inexperienced troops under his command.
The British heard rumors that Wayne was in the area, and Howe dispatched scouts, who reported his location to be near the Paoli Tavern and Warren Tavern in present-day Malvern on September 19. Since his position was just 4 miles (6.4 km) from the British camp in Tredyffrin Township, Howe immediately planned an attack on Wayne's camp.
At 10 p.m. on September 20, British commander Major General Charles Grey marched his forces from the British camp and launched a surprise attack on Wayne's camp above the Warren Tavern in present-day Malvern not far from the General Paoli Tavern. Grey's troops included the 2nd Light Infantry, a composite battalion formed from the light companies of 13 regiments, plus the 42nd Royal Highland Regiment and 44th Regiment of Foot. A dozen troopers of the 16th Queen's Light Dragoons were in the vanguard of the main British column. Altogether, Grey's force numbered approximately 1,200 men.
To ensure that the Americans were not alerted, Grey ordered his troops to advance in silence with muskets unloaded and attack with bayonets alone. In the case that loads could not be drawn from weapons, he ordered that the flints should be removed instead, earning the Grey the epithet "No Flint" Grey. Major John Maitland, commanding officer of the 2nd Light Infantry battalion, was given permission to advance with muskets loaded, giving his personal assurance that his men could be relied on not to fire.
Earlier, Wayne received two warnings of a possible attack and sent out mounted sentries, who spotted the British force two miles from the camp and gave the alarm. Reaching Warren Tavern, the British forced a local blacksmith to guide them and approached the camp silently along heavily wooded roads, where they hit a sentry post. Most of the sentries fired into the dark, exposing their position and were annihilated by the silent British vanguard. In the camp up the hill from the pickets, Wayne's troops were already formed up and armed. Hearing the firing from the picket on the right, the main body of Wayne's force began moving west out of camp in a column through well-fenced fields when a disabled cannon blocked the avenue of escape for several minutes. With loud battle cries, the British stormed into the camp in three waves: the 2nd Light Infantry in the lead, followed by the 44th and the 42nd, and light dragoons sweeping across the camp. Some of Wayne's troops fired in the direction of the British attack, exposing their positions in the dark; the rear of Wayne's column was silhouetted by their campfires. Some fired into each other and the ensuing chaos caused troops in that part of the line to panic and run. Wayne organized a rearguard defense, but many of his troops fled from the camp and were pursued for a mile or two. Near White Horse Tavern, the British encountered William Smallwood's forces and routed it as well.
With only four British killed and seven wounded, the British routed an entire American division. American casualties from the battle are more uncertain. Historian Thomas J. McGuire says that 53 dead Americans were buried on the battlefield but "whether these were all of the American dead or only those found on the campsite-battlefield is uncertain". Local tradition says that eight more American (and some British) soldiers killed in the battle were buried at St. Peter's Church in the Great Valley, an Anglican church.An estimated 71 prisoners were taken by the British, 40 of whom were so badly wounded that they had to be left behind in nearby houses.According to McGuire, a total of 272 men were killed, wounded, or missing from Wayne's division after the battle. McGuire reports that on the day after the battle, 52 dead Americans were buried, and another body was found later. Among the buried, 39 are unnamed. The highest ranking American officer killed was Major Mareen Lamar (sometimes misspelled Marien).
An official inquiry found that Wayne was not guilty of misconduct but that he had made a tactical error. Wayne was enraged and demanded a full court-martial. On November 1, a board of 13 officers overruled the inquiry's initial report, concluding that Wayne had acted with honor.
The incident gained notoriety partly because of accounts by supposed eyewitnesses, who claimed that the British had bayoneted or mutilated Americans as they were attempting to surrender. Reports included the following:
I with my own Eyes, see them, cut & hack some of our poor Men to pieces after they had fallen in their hands and scarcely shew the least Mercy to any...:— Lt. Col. Adam Hubley, 10th Pennsylvania Regiment
...more than a dozen soldiers had with fixed bayonets formed a cordon round him, and that every one of them in sport had indulged their brutal ferocity by stabbing him in different parts of his body and limbs...a physician...examining him there was found..46 distinct bayonet wounds...:— William Hutchinson, Pennsylvania Militiaman
The Enemy last Night at twelve o'clock attacked...Our Men just raised from Sleep, moved disorderly — Confusion followed...The Carnage was very great...this is a bloody Month:— Col. Thomas Hartley, 1st Pennsylvania Regiment
The Annals of the Age Cannot Produce such another Scene of Butchery...:— Maj. Samuel Hay, 7th Pennsylvania Regiment
American military historian Mark M. Boatner III refuted these allegations, writing:
American propagandists succeeded in whipping up anti-British sentiment with false accusations that Grey's men had refused quarter and massacred defenseless patriots who tried to surrender. Gen Heath's (American) comment is simply that, "the bayonet was chiefly made use of, and it proved but too efficacious ...The "no quarter" charge is refuted by the fact that the British took 71 prisoners. The "mangled dead" is explained by the fact that the bayonet is a messy weapon.
Wayne's troops swore revenge and "Remember Paoli!" was used by them as a battle cry at the Battles of Germantown and Stony Point.
To show their defiance, the men of the 2nd Light Infantry dyed their hat feathers red so the Americans would be able to identify them. In 1833, the Light Company of the 46th Regiment of Foot were authorized to wear red cap distinctions instead of the regulation Light Infantry green in commemoration of this gesture.
In 1934, the Royal Berkshire Regiment, which carried on the traditions of the 49th Foot, were authorized to wear a red distinction in their head dress although, misleadingly, this was granted "to commemorate the role of the Light Company at the battle of Brandywine Creek". In the second half of the 20th century, the descendants of both regiments wore red backing to their cap badges and did so until 2006 when The Light Infantry and the Royal Gloucestershire, Berkshire and Wiltshire Regiment were absorbed by The Rifles.
I had to leave the last two paragraphs in - they are so quintessentially British Army!
Hope this was of interest - a great little scenario for anyone interested in the AWI, I can imagine it would work very well with the large-scale skirmish rules like Rebels and Patriots of Sharpe Practice, and once again, thanks to Mark for bringing this action to my attention in the first place.
Very interesing battle, or "massacre" as the press would have it. Beautiful figs and nice terrain. I agree that it could work with other skirmish type rules too.
ReplyDeleteThanks a lot Dean - glad you liked it!
DeleteGood looking battle Keith and a really interesting read, a battle well worth gaming.
ReplyDeleteThanks Donnie - I am sure a better job could be done of the game than I managed - maybe we will see it on Matts table in March?!
DeleteGreat looking Battle Keith and one we are close to reaching in our AWI campaign. But first we have to tackle Brandywine 👍
ReplyDeleteThanks matt and looking forward to seeing how you and Jon handle this rather one-sided affair. Brandywine is a great battle - I remember "doing" it about 20 years ago - lots of special rules/dice rolls for whether or not the Americans picked up intelligence on the British flank march - great fun!
DeleteKeith, well done, great to see the recently painted units on a table. Good overview of the battle.
ReplyDeleteThanks a lot Joe - I cannot take ANY credit for the overview of the battle; it's all copy and pasted from Google!
DeleteAn interesting battle and thank you for the overview
ReplyDeleteCheers Scotty - I once again also have to give credit to Mark (Old Nick) for bringing it to my attention!
DeleteGreat looking battle sir!
ReplyDeleteWarm regards
Thank you Michal!
DeleteSmashing batrep and background info.
ReplyDeleteCheers JBM. Might not be much fun as a two player game, if you were playing the Americans!
DeleteNever heard of that before! Enjoyable game/AAR.
ReplyDeleteThanks Chris and likewise- I am indebted to the commenter below for bringing it to my attention.
DeleteOutstanding post with excellent information. Especially liked the information about how regiments in the army of Great Britain still remember the action. Your game is excellent!
ReplyDeleteCheers Mark...you can take much of the credit, as I have mentioned several times in both my post and replies to other comments! As for the info, all I did was use Google and copy what I found!
DeleteI very interesting scenario Keith…
ReplyDeleteI think the British/Canadians caught the Americans out in a similar way during the War of 1812… but I can’t remember the name of that action.
All the best. Aly
Interesting information Aly....as it happens, I have troops for the War of 1812, too....maybe I can find the details of that on line and do another game?!
DeleteThe ‘battle’ was…
DeleteStoney Creek 6th June 1813…
All the best. Aly
Sweet - thanks Aly - will have a look online for the details! Watch this space......
DeleteVery interesting to read and some wonderful pictures of your miniatures.
ReplyDeleteThanks Peter and I am pleased you liked the pics!
DeleteTried Stoney Creek once. Went ok but I think I will try it again using your game as a template
DeleteSounds like a great idea, Mark...look forward to seeing how it goes
DeleteI remember reading about this battle Keith and wondering if it would make a good scenario, so the British win is not a total surprise. Lovely stuff.
ReplyDeleteOne for you to try when you have finished painting your AWI collection Lawrence!
DeleteGreat looking game Keith but not much fun for the Rebels.
ReplyDeleteI wonder if they would have made a better go of it if they had held their lines rather than retreat.
Thanks Ben...8 think the Americans panicked....they probably could have repellent the attack otherwise.
DeleteGreat read and great looking figures. Well done!
ReplyDeleteThank you kindly, Bill...glad you enjoyed it!
DeleteNice info on the battle and 'hats off' to Mark for first highlighting it:). The game looked great and certainly your new mat makes the game much more cohesive from a visual point of view. As for the 'massacre', there's nothing like changing the narrative of a heavy loss into something to get the locals riled up for revenge etc!
ReplyDeleteThanks Steve - glad you approve! Yes, we cannot take credit for the invention of "fake news" in the 21st century - that's for sure!
DeleteVery nice and an interesting encounter to recreate on the table top.
ReplyDeleteCheers Stu - happy you found it interesting!
DeleteGreat report on a really good looking game. Those poor yanks...
ReplyDeleteThanks Dai - yes, the "Patriots" seem to have been caught napping - literally!
DeleteA superb looking game and really interesting background and epilogue too!
ReplyDeleteRegards, James
Thank you, James - the internet can be a very useful tool - I can't take much credit for the background info on the "battle"!
Delete