Wednesday 31 July 2024

Col Henleys "Additional" Continental Regiment - AWI

 The Additional Continental regiments differ from all other Continental Army infantry regiments by the manner in which they formed.

The 16 Additional Continental regiments were approved by Congress as a separate group on December 27, 1776, specifically in response to a request from Gen. George Washington for additional troops, and Congress expressly delegated their formation directly to Washington.

All Additional Continental regiments were organized in the spring and summer of 1777. In contrast to both the Extra and Additional regiments, all other infantry regiments of the army were organized and supported under the direct authority of individual state governments.

The 16 Additional Continental regiments formed later and under distinctly different circumstances than those of the Extra Continental regiments.

The 1-year enlistments in most Continental Army regiments that formed in the earliest part of the American Revolutionary War expired on December 31, 1776. Therefore, Congress and Washington began preparations for reorganizing the army during that early fall.

The reorganization was to apply to troops from every state, and a major factor in the new plan was the decision to recruit for the duration of the war rather than for a single year.

Eighty-eight regiments were authorized by a Congressional resolve of September 16, 1776, in which Congress formally outlined the 13 state lines of the Continental Army by specifying the quota of regiments for each state.

Congress' estimates of the population of each state governed its allocation of regiments, ranging from 15 regiments each from Massachusetts and Virginia to single regiments from Delaware and Georgia. In correspondence to Congress during December 1776, however, Washington pressed for even more men.

Central to Washington's position was a recommendation to increase the infantry regiments from the 88 called for in September to a minimum of 110.

In contrast to the previously approved 88 regiments, the 16 Additional regiments were organized directly by Washington's authority, rather than by the authority of the state governments, and were placed completely under Washington's control.

The resolution gave Washington the requested 110 regiments, for in addition to the 16 new regiments and the 88 units of the September quotas there were the 6 Extra regiments that had been previously approved by Congress and that were also not explicitly tied to a single state.

Units designated "Additional Continental Regiments" were unnumbered infantry regiments authorized in 1777. These units were raised "at large" and not part of any state's quota, although some were later adopted into state lines. Sixteen regiments were authorized, but because of manpower shortages Washington attempted to raise only 15.

Two of these 15 (Cornell's and Scammell's Regiments) were never organized because their colonels declined the position in favour of other commands, leaving 13 "additional" regiments. Although Washington wrote to Col. Ezekiel Cornell of Rhode Island and Col. Alexander Scammell of New Hampshire on January 12, 1777, and offered each command of one of the 16 Additional Continental regiments, both declined, and the units never raised.

Congress subsequently authorized one more "additional" regiment, Sheppard's Additional Continental Regiment, but it was absorbed into the weak North Carolina line within a year. The 16 Additional Continental regiments are:

Cornell's Continental Regiment (never formed)

Forman's Continental Regiment

Gist's Continental Regiment

Grayson's Continental Regiment

Hartley's Continental Regiment

Henley's Continental Regiment

Jackson's Continental Regiment

Lee's Continental Regiment

Malcolm's Continental Regiment

Patton's Continental Regiment

Sheppard's Continental Regiment

Sherburne's Continental Regiment

Spencer's Continental Regiment

Scammell's Continental Regiment (never formed)

Thruston's Continental Regiment

Webb's Continental Regiment

Formans Additional Continental Regiment

Henley's Additional Continental Regiment

Authorized on January 12, 1777 in the Continental Army as Henley's Additional Continental Regiment.

Assigned on May 23, 1777 to the Eastern Department

Organized in spring and summer 1777 at Boston to consist of 5 companies from Middlesex, Essex, Suffolk, and Worcester Counties, Massachusetts and Hillsborough and Rockingham Counties, New Hampshire.

Reassigned on March 18, 1778 from the Eastern Department and assigned to the Main Continental Army.

Reassigned on July 22, 1778 from the Main Army and assigned to the Eastern Department.

Consolidated on April 9, 1779 with Henry Jackson's Additional Continental Regiment.

Significant Campaigns and Battles

The regiment would see action during the New York and New Jersey Campaign (1776-77) and the Philadelphia Campaign 1777-78. It took part in the following major battles:

Battle of Rhode Island (1778)

Battle of Monmouth (1778)

Colonel David Henley himself seems to have been quite a character. Born in 1749, he served on the staffs of General William Heath and Lord Stirling before being charged with forming his regiment. In November 1778 he was appointed as Washington's Chief Intelligence Officer and set to work devising a system of recording intelligence in a meaningful and constructive way.

Right, after all that - here are a few pictures! Uniforms based again on the illustration in the free uniform info that comes with the Perry plastic box set.














Great stuff, but what's next? I hear you cry :) Well, dear readers, after a couple of recommendations, I have elected to paint up another Perry unit as Sherburne's Additional Continental Regiment, who will hopefully look something similar to this:


Thanks for your visit and especially for any comments you are kind enough to leave!

33 comments:

  1. Excellent job explaining additional and extra units. Ad hoc but useful system, add units until you have enough.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Joe, but as usual, I cannot take any credit for original research....all the information explaining the additional regiment system was lifted directly from a website, although not Wikipedia on this occasion!

      Delete
  2. Interesting explanation of the Additional regiments. I would expect some confusion in battle with redcoats in the American army. Excellent brushwork, as usual, Keith!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Jon! There are quite a few of the earlier regiments clothed in red coats, so I agree, it may well have caused some confusion at times....could be the basis for a small scenario....!

      Delete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nice work there Kieth- you certainly have done a good deal of your AWI troops- all to a superb standard. KEV.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Kev, I have been grinding my way through the multiple boxes of Perry figures!

      Delete
  5. Great looking AWI troops again, Keith. I had that Perry set, and the illustrations of the different uniforms was very inspiring.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Dean, and yes indeed...the info the Perry's supply free of charge would have cost us the purchase of several books twenty years ago!

      Delete
  6. Outstanding painting and excellent explanation of the additional regiments of the Continental army. You took a confusing subject (that too many authors got wrong) and explained it clearly. Great job! Now off to my new continental line regiments.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Mark, praise indeed from a subject expert such as your good self....shame I can't take any of the credit, as mentioned to Joe above!
      I look forward to seeing your lead pile shrink, as you add a couple of new units to your AWI collection!

      Delete
  7. A great bit of history and a lovely addition to your collection, good choice with the next regiment, Sherburne's is another cracking uniform.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cheers Donnie, glad you like them.....and Sherburnes is definitely a riot of colours!

      Delete
  8. A nice history and great job on these Keith. As Jonathan noted, I wonder how often they were shot at by their own side?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Lawrence....I guess any confusion would be infrequent, as the adjacent American units would know one of the other American battalions was dressed in red...and as mentioned above, this isn't a unique case...there are several American regiments wearing red coats and black tricorns in the Perry uniform guide...!
      There is the famous case of the Swiss (in French service) at the battle of Maida being mistaken from Brits and fired on because they were in red coats, but I don't think I have heard of similar events in N America....

      Delete
  9. A great job on those figures Keith.
    Interesting information on the different regiments. Interesting how they got individual officers to raise each regiment. I assume recruit the soldiers, train and equip them?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Ben and yes, I would suppose so....very similar to how ECW regiments were raised....I assume the Cols nominated were local big wigs who had some sort of previous military experience...probably from the FIW, like Washington himself!

      Delete
  10. Great looking redcoats! I guess the Hessians on the British side wore blue, so red and blue on both sides?
    Best Iain

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cheers Iain, and that's a fair point too!

      Delete
  11. stop reminding me of my slumbering AWI project that never got off the ground....you and your pretty figures and whole units. ๐Ÿ˜

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That sounds interesting Stew, we all look forward to seeing you get started on your AWI lead pile and following your progress very soon ๐Ÿ˜€

      Delete
  12. Great figures Keith. I knew you'd like Sherborne's uniform. All those luvvly colours! For some reason it reminds me of the old sweets Toffoes. They used to do a pack of fruit flavours, including loads of e numbers I suppose. Do you remember them?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Ray, it's certainly a really "hi viz" uniform!
      I kind of know what you mean re the toffees although I don't remember multi coloured fruit ones....I remember plain toffee, and some that were black and liquorice flavoured?!

      Delete
  13. A most handsome addition to your forces, and I too appreciate the interesting background information!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you Peter....I am happy to copy and paste the results of my Google searches as a public service to wargamers everywhere ๐Ÿ˜€

      Delete
  14. Well that's a fine unit Keith and the next planned one should look great too:). Lovely bit of background info too which I was somewhat unware of, so always good to learn something new.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Nice to see the AWI collection growing Keith!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cheers John, it is getting there, slowly!

      Delete
  16. Another lovely colourful unit Keith…
    Sherburnes are certainly going look damn fine when they are done.

    All the best. Aly

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Aly - Sherburne's Regiment is 2/3 done and they do look rather spiffing!

      Delete